TL;DR
We spent two years accumulating security debt with "we'll fix it later" decisions. When we finally had an incident, the total cost was over $87,000 including remediation, lost business, legal fees, and reputation damage. Prevention would have cost under $10,000 total. Security debt has compound interest, and the rate is brutal.
Everyone talks about technical debt. We need to talk about security debt. It compounds faster, and when payment comes due, it often arrives all at once - with interest.
The Math Nobody Wants to Do
Prevention cost breakdown:
- Security scanning tools: $200/month x 24 months = $4,800
- Developer time for fixes: ~40 hours = $2,000
- Annual pen test: $1,600
Incident cost breakdown:
- Emergency remediation (contractor fees): $15,000
- Legal consultation: $8,000
- Customer notification and support: $5,000
- Lost customers (estimated LTV): $35,000
- Lost deals during incident: $20,000
- Internal team time (incident response): $4,000
How the Debt Accumulated
It wasn't one big decision. It was hundreds of small ones:
"Each time we said 'we'll add rate limiting later' or 'auth can wait until v2,' we were taking out a loan. We thought we were moving fast. We were just deferring costs."
Our security debt ledger over two years:
- Month 2: Skipped input validation to hit deadline
- Month 5: Used localStorage for tokens "temporarily"
- Month 8: Ignored npm audit warnings during feature push
- Month 11: Delayed implementing rate limiting
- Month 14: Skipped pen test to save money
- Month 18: Admin panel shipped without proper auth
- Month 22: Dependencies 18 months out of date
- Month 24: Incident. Payment due.
The Hidden Costs Nobody Mentions
- Team morale during crisis mode
- Founder/CEO time consumed by incident response
- Delayed roadmap while fixing issues
- Increased insurance premiums
- Harder future fundraising conversations
- Personal stress and burnout
Why Security Debt is Worse Than Technical Debt
Technical debt slows you down gradually. Security debt waits silently until it explodes:
- Technical debt: Costs come as slower development, harder maintenance
- Security debt: Costs come as sudden incidents, often at the worst time
You can ship with messy code and refactor later. You can't un-breach your users' data.
How to Avoid Our Mistake
- Track security tasks: They're part of the backlog, not a separate "someday" list
- Calculate real costs: Compare fix-now cost vs. potential incident cost
- Set a debt limit: Maximum number of security issues allowed before stopping features
- Automate detection: Can't fix what you don't see
- Budget for security: It's a real line item, not overhead
- Regular audits: Quarterly review of outstanding security debt
The Conversation We Should Have Had
Two years ago, if someone had shown me these numbers, I might have made different decisions. Instead of asking "can we ship without this security feature?", I should have asked "can we afford the interest on this security loan?"
The answer would have been no. It always is.
How do I convince my team to prioritize security?
Frame it in business terms: cost of incidents vs. cost of prevention. Share stories like this one. Calculate your potential incident cost based on user count and data sensitivity. Make the math impossible to ignore.
::
How do I know how much security debt I have?
Run automated scans. Track security-related items in your backlog. Count how many "fix later" security comments exist in your code. The number might surprise you.
When is it okay to defer security work?
When you've documented it, assigned an owner, and set a deadline. When the risk is low and time-bounded. When leadership has explicitly accepted the risk. Never when it's just "too busy right now."
::
Scan your vibe coded projects to understand what you're deferring.
Check Your Vibe Now