TL;DR
AWS offers the broadest security services portfolio with fine-grained IAM controls. Google Cloud provides excellent default encryption and simpler IAM with organization-wide policies. Both have extensive compliance certifications. AWS has more third-party security integrations; GCP has stronger container and Kubernetes security. Choose based on existing expertise and specific security service requirements.
AWS and Google Cloud are the two most popular choices for deploying applications requiring robust security. Both offer comprehensive security services, but they have different approaches to IAM, encryption, and security tooling. This comparison helps you understand which platform better fits your security requirements.
Security Feature Comparison
| Security Feature | AWS | Google Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| IAM Model | Fine-grained policies | Role-based with conditions |
| Default Encryption | Opt-in for most services | Default for all services |
| Key Management | KMS with HSM option | Cloud KMS with HSM option |
| Secret Management | Secrets Manager | Secret Manager |
| VPC Security | Security Groups, NACLs | Firewall rules, VPC SC |
| DDoS Protection | Shield (Standard/Advanced) | Cloud Armor |
| Container Security | Good | Excellent (GKE) |
| Compliance Certs | Extensive | Extensive |
Identity and Access Management
AWS IAM
AWS IAM is powerful but complex. Policies can be extremely fine-grained, allowing or denying specific API actions on specific resources with conditions. This flexibility enables precise security controls but requires significant expertise to configure correctly. Misconfigurations are common and can create security gaps.
Google Cloud IAM
GCP IAM uses predefined roles that bundle permissions logically. It's simpler to understand but less granular than AWS. Organization policies can enforce security controls across all projects. The simpler model reduces misconfiguration risk but may require workarounds for complex scenarios.
Encryption Practices
AWS Encryption
AWS requires explicitly enabling encryption for many services. S3, EBS, and RDS all support encryption but it's not always the default. This flexibility is useful but creates risk if developers forget to enable encryption. AWS KMS manages encryption keys with CloudHSM for dedicated hardware.
Google Cloud Encryption
GCP encrypts all data at rest by default without configuration. This secure-by-default approach eliminates a common security oversight. Cloud KMS provides key management with Cloud HSM for hardware-backed keys. Customer-managed encryption keys (CMEK) are available for additional control.
Choose AWS When: You need the broadest range of security services, fine-grained IAM controls, or specific compliance requirements that AWS's extensive certifications satisfy. AWS's ecosystem of security partners and third-party tools is unmatched. Best for organizations with AWS expertise and complex multi-account architectures.
Choose Google Cloud When: You prefer secure defaults, simpler IAM, or need strong Kubernetes security. GCP's default encryption and organization policies reduce configuration burden. Best for teams using containers heavily, organizations wanting simpler security configuration, or those building AI/ML workloads with Vertex AI.
Network Security
AWS VPC Security
AWS provides Security Groups (stateful firewalls) and NACLs (stateless network ACLs). VPC Flow Logs capture network traffic for analysis. AWS WAF protects web applications, and Shield provides DDoS protection with Standard tier free and Advanced tier for enhanced protection.
GCP VPC Security
GCP uses hierarchical firewall rules and VPC Service Controls for data exfiltration prevention. Cloud Armor provides WAF and DDoS protection. Private Google Access allows resources to reach Google APIs without public IPs. The hierarchical model makes organization-wide rules easier to manage.
Best Practices for Both Platforms
- Enable MFA for all user accounts and root/organization accounts
- Use service accounts/roles instead of long-lived credentials
- Enable audit logging (CloudTrail/Cloud Audit Logs) for all services
- Encrypt all data at rest and in transit
- Implement least-privilege access for all identities
- Use organization policies to enforce security guardrails
- Regularly review and rotate credentials
Which cloud has better compliance certifications?
Both have extensive certifications including SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and FedRAMP. AWS has slightly more certifications due to longer market presence. For most compliance requirements, either platform will satisfy auditors.
Is GCP's default encryption sufficient?
GCP's default encryption is strong and sufficient for most use cases. For additional control, use customer-managed encryption keys (CMEK) or customer-supplied encryption keys (CSEK). The default encryption prevents common data-at-rest exposure issues.
Which platform is better for Kubernetes security?
GKE (Google Kubernetes Engine) generally has better security features including Shielded GKE nodes, Workload Identity, and Binary Authorization. AWS EKS is capable but requires more configuration for equivalent security posture.
Secure Your Cloud Deployment
CheckYourVibe scans your code for security issues before deploying to any cloud platform.
Try CheckYourVibe Free